MEPC 2020-2021

DOCUMENTS FOR THE SEMINAR OF JEAN BARATGIN

DateTitleSlidesVidéosFor more in-depth reading
Mercredi 12 NovembreConcept, modèles normatif de référence et nouveau paradigme du raisonnementPDF
  • Séminaire 1

  • Bernard Walliser, Ce que peut apporter la neuroéconomie à l'économie. Collège de France 04 mai 2009. ppt

  • Pierre Jacob — L'empirisme logique
  • Hammond, K. R. (2000). Coherence and correspondence theories in judgment and decision making. In T. Connolly, H. R. Arkes, & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Cambridge series on judgment and decision making. Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (p. 53–65). Cambridge University Press. pdf
  • Jungermann, H. (1983). The two camps on rationality. In H. R. Arkes & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (p. 627–641). Cambridge University Press. (This chapter originally appeared in Scholz, R. W. (Ed.) "Decision Making under Uncertainty" (pp. 63-86), Amsterdam: Elsevier. pdf

    		•
    Mercredi 13 novembreHypothèses majeures en question: du modèle binaire au nouveau paradigmepdf
  • Séminaire 1/2
  • Séminaire 2/2
  • Baratgin, J. (2002). La question du modèle de référence dans l’étude expérimentale de la révision probabiliste. In P. Livet, Révision des croyances (pp. 369-386). Hermes publication. pdf
  • Baratgin, J. (2002). Le jugement probabiliste. In G. Politzer, Le raisonnement humain (pp. 241-270). Hermes publication. pdf
  • Baratgin, J. (2018). Le nouveau paradigme psychologique de l’étude du raisonnement. In D. Andler, T. Collins, & C. Tallon-Baudry (Eds.), La cognition. Du neurone à la société (pp. 465–486). Paris: Gallimard. pdf
  • Baratgin, J., & Politzer, G. (2006). Is the mind Bayesian? The case for agnosticism. Mind & Society, 5, 1-38. pdf
  • Baratgin, J., & Politzer, G. (2016). Logic, probability and inference: a methodology for a new paradigm. In L. Macchi, M. Bagassi et R. Viale (Eds.), Cognitive Unconscious and Human Rationality (pp. 119-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pdf
  • Lee, L., Frederick, S., & Ariely, D. (2006). Try it, you'll like it: The influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1054-1058. pdf
  • Peterson, C. R., & Beach, L. R. (1967). Man as an intuitive Bayesian.
    Psychological Bulletin, 68, 1-29. pdf
  • Politzer, G. & Noveck, I. (1991). Are conjunction rule violations the result of conversational rule violations? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20(2):83-103. pdf
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), ), 1124-1131. pdf
    		•
    mercredi 18 novembreJugement probabiliste & Prise de décisionpdf
  • Séminaire 1/2
  • Séminaire 2/2
  • Baratgin, J., Politzer, G., Over, D. E., & Takahaschi, T. (2018). The psychology of uncertainty and three-valued truth tables. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1479. pdf
  • Baratgin, J., Coletti, G, Jamet, F., & Petturiti, D. (2017). Experimental evaluation of the understanding of qualitative probability and probabilistic reasoning in young children. In S. Benferhat, K. Tabia and M. Ali (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 10351 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 559-568), Springer, Cham. pdf
  • Baratgin, J., Over, D. E., & Politzer, G. (2013). Uncertainty and de Finetti tables, Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 308-328. pdf
  • Finetti, B. (1937). La prévision : ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’I. H. P.,7, 1, 1-68. pdf
  • Good, I.J. (1971). 46656 varieties of Bayesians. Letter in American Statistician, 25, 62-63. Reprinted in Good (1982), Thinking, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 20-21. pdf
    		•
    Jeudi 19 novembre (matin)La pragmatique en conversation naturelle et artificielle pdf
  • Séminaire
  • Jacquet B, Baratgin J and Jamet F (2019) Cooperation in Online Conversations: The Response Times as a Window Into the Cognition of Language Processing. Front. Psychol. 10:727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00727. pdf
  • Jacquet B., Masson O., Jamet F., Baratgin J. (2019) On the Lack of Pragmatic Processing in Artificial Conversational Agents. In: Ahram T., Karwowski W., Taiar R. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_60. pdf
  • Jacquet B., Baratgin J. (2020). Towards a Pragmatic Model of an Artificial Conversational Partner: Opening the Blackbox. In: Świątek J., Borzemski L., Wilimowska Z. (eds) Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 40th Anniversary International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2019. ISAT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1051. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30604-5_15. pdf
  • Hawkins J, Lewis M, Klukas M, Purdy S and Ahmad S (2019) A Framework for Intelligence and Cortical Function Based on Grid Cells in the Neocortex. Front. Neural Circuits 12:121. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2018.00121. pdf
    		•
    Jeudi 19 novembre (après midi)La mindfulness dans l'étude du comportement : Un exemple dans la prise de décisionpdf
  • Séminaire 1/4
  • Séminaire 2/4
  • Séminaire 3/4
  • Séminaire 4/4
  • Csillik, A, & Tafticht, N. Les effets de la mindfulness et des interventions psychologiques basées sur la pleine conscience. Pratiques psychologiques 18 (2012) 147–159. pdf
  • Kabat‐Zinn, J. (2003), Mindfulness‐Based Interventions in Context: Past, Present, and Future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10: 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016. pdf
  • Bishop, S.R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N.D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z.V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D. and Devins, G. (2004), Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11: 230-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077. pdf
  • Tang, YY., Hölzel, B. & Posner, M. The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nat Rev Neurosci 16, 213–225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916. pdf
  • Marchand, W. R. (2014). Neural mechanisms of mindfulness and meditation: Evidence from neuroimaging studies. World J Radiol. 28; 6(7): 471–479. pdf
  • Walach, H. (2011). Neuroscience, Consciousness, Spirituality – Questions, Problems and Potential Solutions: An Introductory Essay. pdf
    		•
    Mercredi 25 novembreEffets pragmatiques dans les tâches usuelles de développementspdf
  • Conférence
  • Baratgin J, Dubois-Sage M, Jacquet B, Stilgenbauer J-L and Jamet F (2020) Pragmatics in the False-Belief Task: Let the Robot Ask the Question! Front. Psychol. 11:593807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593807. pdf
  • Jamet ,F., Masson, O., Jacquet,B., Stilgenbauer , J.-L., & Baratgin, J. (2018). Learning by Teaching with Humanoid Robot: A New Powerful Experimental Tool to Improve Children’s Learning Ability. Journal of Robotics, 2, DOI: 10.1155/2018/4578762. pdf
  • Masson,O.,Baratgin,J.,&Jamet,F.(2017). NAO robot as experimenter: social cues emitter and neutralizer to bring new results in experimental psychology. International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT), pp. 256-264. DOI : 10.1109/DT.2017.8024306. pdf
  • McGarrigle J, Donaldson M (1975) Conservation accidents. Cognition 3:341–350. pdf
  • Politzer, G. (2016). The class inclusion question: a case study in applying pragmatics to the experimental study of cognition, SpringerPlus , 5, 1133. pdf
    		•
    Jeudi 26 novembreLe défi de l'expérience consciente : une revue de question contemporainepdf
  • Séminaire 1/3
  • Séminaire 2/3
  • Séminaire 3/3

  • Conférence de Pierre Jacob philosophie de l'esprit et sciences cognitives
  • David Chalmers “The Meta-Problem of Consciousness.”
  • The Hard Problem of Consciousness (Chalmers, Dennett, & Hoffman)
  • François Kammerer - Sommes-nous tous des zombies ?
  • Forstmann M, Burgmer P. Adults are intuitive mind-body dualists. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):222-35. doi: 10.1037/xge0000045. pdf
  • Ripoll, T. (201). Les représentations philosophiques de la relation entre l’« esprit » et le cerveau des enseignants-chercheurs de psychologie : quelques implications, Psychologie Française, 64(3),223-240,
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2017.11.004. pdf
  • Maciej Chudek, Rita Anne McNamara, Susan Birch, Paul Bloom & Joseph Henrich (2018) Do minds switch bodies? Dualist interpretations across ages and societies, Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8:4, 354-368, DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2017.1377757. pdf
  • Chalmers, D.. “The Meta-Problem of Consciousness.” (2018). pdf
  • Yates, D. Neural Synchrony and the Causal Efficacy of Consciousness. Topoi, 39, 1057–1072 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9596-7. pdf
  • Westphal, J. (2016). The Mind–Body Problem. The MIT Press
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10776.001.0001. pdf

    		•
    Mercredi 2 décembreDon : Approche culturelle comparativepptxVidéo du séminaire à venir
  • Frank Jamet Conférence 2017 - Don, culture et effet de dotation
  • Effet de dotation en tribus
  • Effet de dotation Enfant Kanak 3-5 ans
  • Effet de dotation enfants sourds


  • Apicella, C. L., Azevedo, E. M., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2014). Evolutionary Origins of the Endowment Effect: Evidence from Hunter-Gatherers. American Economic Review, 104(6), 1793–1805. pdf
  • Brosnan, S., O. Jones, Molly Gardner, S. Lambeth and S. J. Schapiro. “Evolution and the Expression of Biases: Situational Value Changes The Endowment Effect in Chimpanzees.” Behavioral & Experimental Economics eJournal (2012): n. pag. pdf
  • Jamet, F., & Baratgin, J. (2018). L’Effet de dotation : un outil diagnostique du Syndrome d’épuisement professionnel ?. In F. Jamet, J. Baratgin, & C. Puigellier, (Eds.) Burnout. Droit et Cognition (pp. 93-113). Le Mans, France : Les éditions du Borrégo. pdf
  • Jamet, F., Baratgin, J., & Bearune, C. K. (2017). Effet de dotation approche développementale chez des enfants Kanak. In S. Minvielle (Ed.), L’école calédonienne du destin commun (pp. 88-99). Nouméa, France : Presses Universitaires de Nouvelle-Calédonie. pdf
  • Jamet, F. Baratgin, J., & Godin, P. (2017). Don, droit, coutume, cultures. Études expérimentales sur « l’effet de dotation ». In C. Puigelier, C. Tijus, & F. Jouen (Eds), Décision et Prise de Décision : Droit et cognition (pp. 123-152). Paris, France : Mare et Martin (collection Science et Droit). pdf
  • Knetsch, J. L. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. The American Economic Review, 79(5), 1277–1284. pdf
  • Knetsch, J. L., & Wong, W.-K. (2009). The endowment effect and the reference state: Evidence and manipulations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 407–413. pdf
  • Masson, O., Baratgin, J. & Jamet, F. (2015). NAO robot and the “endowment effect, IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), Lyon, 2015, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ARSO.2015.7428203. pdf
  • Plott, C., & Zeiler, K. (2007). Exchange asymmetries incorrectly interpreted as evidence of endowment effect theory and prospect theory? The American Economic Review, 97(4), 1449–1466. pdf
    		•
    Mercredi 16 septembreLa psychologie morale du tribalism politiquepdfVidéo à venir
  • Pascal Boyer, Minds Make Societies. pdf

    Lire:


    - Introduction: Human societie trhrough the lens of nature. Six problems in search of a new science
    - Chapter 1: What Is the Root of Group Conflict? Why “Tribalism” Is Not an Urge but a Computation


  • De Dreu, C. K. W. & Gross, J. (2019). Revisiting the form and function of conflict:Neurobiological, psychological, and culturalmechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. pdf
  • Marie, A., Altay, S. & Strickland, B. (in press). Moral conviction increases sharing preference for politically congruent headlines. pdf
  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic. pdf
  • Whitehouse, H. (2018). Dying for the group: Towards a general theoryof extreme self-sacrifice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. pdf
    		•
  • Baratgin, J., Ocak, B., Bessaa, H., & Stilgenbauer, J.-L. (2017). Updating context in the Equation: An experimental argument with eye tracking. In M. B. Ferraro, P. Giordani, B. Vantagi, M. Gagolewski, M. Angeles Gil, P. Grzegorzewski, & O. Hryniewicz (Eds.), Soft Methods for Data Science, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 456 (pp. 25–33). Springer. pdf
  • Baratgin, J., & Politzer, G. (2010). Updating: A psychologically basic situation of probability revision. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 253-287. pdf
  • Baratgin, J., & Walliser, B. (2010). Sleeping Beauty and the absent-minded driver. Theory & Decision, 69, 489-496. pdf
  • Elga, A. (2000). Self-locating belief and the sleeping Beauty problem. Analysis, 60, 143–147. pdf
  • Lewis, D. (2001). Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Elga. Analysis, 61, 171–176. pdf
  • Politzer, G., Over, D. E., & Baratgin, J. (2010). Betting on conditionals. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 172-197. pdf
    		•
  • Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica, 21(4), 503-546. pdf

  • Ellsberg, Daniel (1961). Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 75(4), 643-669. pdf
  • Frederick, S., 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. pdf
  • Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684-704. pdf
    		•