Rawls (experiment), Veil of ignorance
Bond, D., & Park, J. C. (1991). An empirical test of Rawls’s theory of justice: a second approach, in Korea and in the United States. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 443-462. pdf
Carlsson, F., Gupta, G., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2003). Choosing from behind a veil of ignorance in India. Applied Economics Letters, 10, 825-827. pdf
Cruz-Doña, R., dela Martina, A. (2000). Diverse groups agreeing on a system of justice in distribution: evidence from the Philippines. The Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 11, 35-76. pdf
Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., & Eavey, C. L. (1987a). Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groups. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 606-636. pdf
Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., & Eavey, C. L. (1987b). Laboratory results on Rawls’ distributive justice. British Journal of Political Science, 17, 1-21. pdf
Johansson-Stenman, O., Carlsson, F., & Daruvala, D. (2002). Measuring future grandparents’ preferences for equality and relative standing. The Economical Journal, 112, 362-383. pdf
Kownov, J. (2013). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 1188-1239. pdf
Krawczyk, K. (2010). A glimpse through the veil of ignorance: Equality of opportunity and support for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 131-141. pdf
Kriss, P. H., Loewenstein, G., Wang, X. & Weber, R. A. et al (2001). Behind the veil of ignorance: self-serving bias in climate change negotiations. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 602-615. pdf
Lissowski, G., Tyszka, T., & Okrasa, W. (1991). Principles of distributive justice. Experiments in Poland and America. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 98-119. pdf
Michaelson, Z. (2015). Biases in choices about fairness: psychology and economic inequality. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 198-203. pdf
Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth auintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 9-12. pdf
Schildberg-Hörisch, H. (2010). Is the veil of ignorance only a concept about risk? An experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 1062-1066. pdf
Yaari, M. E., & Bar-Hillel, M. (1984). On dividing justly. Social Choice and Welfare, 1, 1-24. pdf
Dictator & Ultimatum game
Bühren, C., & Kundt, T. C. (2015). Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 185-190.
(pdf, html)
Chiang, Y. S., & Wu, C. I. (2015). Social in fluence and the adaptation of parochial altruism: a dictator-game experiment on children and adolescents under peer influence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 430-437. pdf
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454, 1079–1083. pdf
Pillutla, M., & Murnighan, J. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 208-224. pdf
Tognetti A, Berticat C, Raymond, M., Faurie C. (2013). Is cooperativeness readable in static facial features? An inter-cultural approach. Evolution and Human Behavior. 34: 427-432. pdf
Ultimatum game & Humanoid robot
Fukuda, H., Shiomi, M., Nakagawa, K, & Ueda, K. (1912). “Midas Touch” in Human-Robot Interaction: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials during the Ultimatum Game”
HRI2012 Late Breaking Reports. pdf
Hoegen, R. (2015). Human Behavior towards Virtual Humans. Master Thesis. Human Media Interaction & USC Institute for Creative Technologies. University of Twente. pdf
Nitsch, V., & Glassen, T. (2015). Investigating the effects of robot behavior and attitude towards technology on social human-robot interactions. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International. Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Kobe, Japan. pdf
Sandoval, E. B., Brandstetter, J., Obaid, M., & Bartneck, C. (à paraître). Reciprocity in Human Robot Interaction – A Quantitative Approach Through The Prisoner’s Dilemma And The Ultimatum Game. International Journal on Social Robotics. pdf
Sanfey, A., Rilling, J., Aronson, J., Nystrom, L., Cohen, J.: T (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755-1758. pdf
Shuichi Nishio, Kohei Ogawa, Yasuhiro Kanakogi, Shoji Itakura, & Hiroshi Ishiguro (2012) Do robot appearance and speech affect people’s attitude? Evaluation through the Ultimatum Game, In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Paris, France, pp. 809-814. pdf
Torta, E., van Dijk, E., Ruijten, P. A. M., & Cuijpers, R. H. (2013). The Ultimatum Game as Measurement Tool for Anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Interaction. In Social Robotic, G. Herrmann, M. J. Pearson, A. Lenz, P. Bremner; A. Spiers, & U. Leonards, ed. (pp. 209-217 ), Volume 8239 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Springer. pdf
Norme Social
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. et al, “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 28, 795–855. pdf
Binmore, K. (2010). Social norms or social preferences?. Mind and Society, 9, 139–15. pdf
Interaction Robot
Borenstein, J., & Arkin, R. (2015). Robotic Nudges: The Ethics of Engineering a More Socially Just Human Being. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1-16. pdf
Erden, M. S. (2013). Emotional Postures for the Humanoid-Robot Nao. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 441–456. pdf
Hoffman, G. et al. (2015). Robot Presence and Human Honesty: Experimental Evidence. HRI ’15 Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Pages 181-188. pdf
Hinds, P. J. , T. L. Roberts, H. Jones. (2004). Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task. Human Computer Interaction. 19, 151-181. pdf
Izui, T., Milleville, I., Sakka, S. & Venture, G (2015). Expressing Emotions using Gait of Humanoid Robot. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Kobe, Japan. pdf
Johnson, D. O., Cuijpers, R.H., Pollmann, K. & Van de Ven, A.A.J. (2015). Exploring the Entertainment Value of Playing Games with a Humanoid Robot. International Journal of Social Robotics. pdf
Kim, M-G, & Suzuki, K. (2014). Comparative Study of Human Behavior in Card Playing with a Humanoid Playmate. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6, 5–15. pdf