Evans, J. St. B. T. (2012). Questions ad challenges for the new psychology of reasoning.
Thinking and Reasoning, 18, 531. pdf
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2013). Reasoning to and from belief: Deduction and
induction are still distinct. Thinking and Reasoning, 19, 267283. pdf
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wijnbergen‐Huitink, J., Elqayam, S., & Over, D.E. (2015). The Probability of Iterated Conditionals. Cognitive Science, 39, 788-803. pdf
Level2: Epistemic level
Equation
Cruz, N. & Oberauer, K. (2014). Comparing the meanings of “if” and “ all”. Memory and Cognition, 42, 13451356. pdf
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pfeifer, N., & Kleiter, G. D. (2010). The conditional in mental probability logic. In M.
Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Cognition and conditionals (pp. 153173). Oxford:
Oxford University Press. pdf
Pfeifer, N., & Kleiter, G. D. (2011). Uncertain deductive reasoning. In K. Manktelow, D. Over,& S. Elqayam(Eds.), The science of reason (pp. 145166). Hove: Psychology Press. pdf
*Baratgin, J., Liang, K., Stilgenbauer, J.-L., & Jouen, F. (June 2014). Contexte d’actualisation et équation : Un nouvel argumant par l’Eye Tracking. ERIS 2014, cité des Sciences, Paris. Résumé.pdf, diapos.pdf
Curley, S. P., & Golden, J. I. (1994). Using belief functions to represent degree of belief. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 271-303. pdf
Douven, I., & Schupbach, J. N. (2015a). The Role of Explanatory Considerations in Updating. Cognition, 142, 299-311. pdf
Douven, I., & Schupbach, J. N. (2015b). Probabilistic Alternatives to Bayesianism: The Case of Explanationism, Frontiers in Psychology 6:459. html
Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1992). Evidence, knowledge, and belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 6, 295–319. pdf
Robinson, L. B., & Hastie, R. (1985). Revision of beliefs when a hypothesis is eliminated from consideration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 443-456. pdf
Walliser, B., & Zwirn, D. (2002). Can Bayes’ rule be justified by cognitive rationality principles? Theory and Decision, 53, 95–135. pdf
Van Wallendael, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Tracing the footsteps of sherlock holmes: Cognitive representations of hypothesis testing. Memory & Cognition, 18, 240–250. pdf
Zhao, J., Crupi, V., Tentori, K., Fitelson, B., and Osherson, D. (2012). Updating: Learning versus Supposing. Cognition,124, 373-378. pdf
Looking At Nothing Methodology
*Ferreira, F., Apel, A. & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Taking a new look at looking at nothing. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 405-410. pdf
*Renkewitz, F., & Jahn, G. (2012). Memory Indexing: A Novel Method for Tracing Memory Processes in Complex Cognitive Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1622-1639. pdf
*Jahn, G., & Braatz, J. (2014). Memory indexing of sequential symptom processing in diagnostic reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 59-97. pdf
*Scholz, A., von Helversen, B., & Rieskamp, J. (2015). Eye movements reveal memory processes during similarity- and rule-based decision making. Cognition,136, 228-246. pdf
Pupil dilatation
Hess, E. H., & J Polt, J. M. (1964). Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving, Science 13 , vol. 143 no. 3611, 1190-1193. pdf
*Goldinger, S. D., & Papesh, M. H. (2012) Pupil dilation reflects the creation and retrieval of memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 90 -95. pdf
Murphy, P. R., Vandekerckhove, J., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2014). Pupil-Linked Arousal Determines Variability in Perceptual Decision Making. PLoS Computational Biology, 10 (9). pdf
Poock, G. K. (1973). Information proceessing vs pupil diameter. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 1000-1002. pdf
Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). The Eyes Have It: Sex and Sexual Orientation Differences in Pupil Dilation Patterns, PLoS ONE. 7(8). pdf
3. Experiment Complete5%
5%
Description
Participants
Passation
Traitement des résultats
Discussion
4. Redaction du manuscript Complete5%
5%
Description
This post is password protected. Enter the password to view comments.