Project Description

Documents

Project Progress

Project Timing

  • Start
    Jan 18 2016
  • End
    Apr 30 2016

01/18/2016 04/30/2016

100%

Overall Project Completion

  • 19/02/2016 Litterature review, Problematic and Hypothesis

    20%
  • Manuscript

    60%

  • 40%

    Experiment

  • 80%

    Presentations slides

20%

19/02/2016 Litterature review, Problematic and Hypothesis

40%

Experiment

60%

Manuscript

80%

Presentations slides

1. design of the research topic Complete 0%

0%
Description
  • Position du problème

2. Litterature Review Complete 5%

5%
Description

 New Paradigm

Level1: Epistemic level

Level2: Epistemic level

Equation

  • Cruz, N. & Oberauer, K. (2014). Comparing the meanings of “if” and “ all”. Memory and Cognition, 42, 13451356. pdf
  • Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pfeifer, N., & Kleiter, G. D. (2010). The conditional in mental probability logic. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Cognition and conditionals (pp. 153173). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pdf
  • *Politzer, G., Over, D. E., & Baratgin, J. (2010). Betting on conditionals. Thinking and Reasoning, 16, 172-197. pdf (matériel)

Deduction under uncertainty

Probability Judgment

Revision context

  • Baratgin, J. (2009). Updating our beliefs about inconsistency: The Monty-Hall case. Mathematical Social Sciences, 57, 67-95. pdf
  • Baratgin, J. (2015). Rationality, the Bayesian standpoint, and the Monty-Hall problem. New frontiers in Psychology, 6:1168. pdf
  • *Baratgin, J., Liang, K., Stilgenbauer, J.-L., & Jouen, F. (June 2014). Contexte d’actualisation et équation : Un nouvel argumant par l’Eye Tracking. ERIS 2014, cité des Sciences, Paris. Résumé.pdf, diapos.pdf
  • Curley,  S. P., & Golden,  J. I. (1994). Using belief functions to represent degree of belief. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes58, 271-303. pdf
  • Douven, I., & Schupbach, J. N. (2015a). The Role of Explanatory Considerations in Updating. Cognition, 142, 299-311. pdf
  • Douven, I., & Schupbach, J. N. (2015b). Probabilistic Alternatives to Bayesianism: The Case of Explanationism, Frontiers in Psychology 6:459. html
  • Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1992). Evidence, knowledge, and belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 6, 295–319. pdf
  • Robinson, L. B., & Hastie, R. (1985). Revision of beliefs when a hypothesis is eliminated from consideration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 443-456. pdf
  • Walliser, B., & Zwirn, D. (2002). Can Bayes’ rule be justified by cognitive rationality principles? Theory and Decision, 53, 95–135. pdf
  • *Walliser, B., & Zwirn, D. (2011). Change rules for hierarchical beliefs. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52, 156-163. pdf
  • Van Wallendael, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Tracing the footsteps of sherlock holmes: Cognitive representations of hypothesis testing. Memory & Cognition, 18, 240–250. pdf
  • Zhao, J., Crupi, V., Tentori, K., Fitelson, B., and Osherson, D. (2012). Updating: Learning versus Supposing. Cognition, 124, 373-378. pdf

    Looking At Nothing Methodology

  • *Ferreira, F., Apel, A. & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Taking a new look at looking at nothing. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 405-410. pdf
  • *Renkewitz, F., & Jahn, G. (2012). Memory Indexing: A Novel Method for Tracing Memory Processes in Complex Cognitive Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1622-1639. pdf
  • *Jahn, G., & Braatz, J. (2014). Memory indexing of sequential symptom processing in diagnostic reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 59-97. pdf
  • *Scholz, A., von Helversen, B.,  & Rieskamp, J. (2015). Eye movements reveal memory processes during similarity- and rule-based decision making. Cognition, 136, 228-246. pdf

    Pupil dilatation

  • Hess, E. H., & J Polt, J. M. (1964). Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving, Science 13 ,  vol. 143 no. 3611, 1190-1193. pdf
  • *Goldinger, S. D., & Papesh, M. H. (2012) Pupil dilation reflects the creation and retrieval of memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 90 -95. pdf
  • Murphy, P. R., Vandekerckhove, J., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2014). Pupil-Linked Arousal Determines Variability in Perceptual Decision Making. PLoS Computational Biology10 (9). pdf
  • Poock, G. K. (1973). Information proceessing vs pupil diameter. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37,  1000-1002. pdf
  • Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). The Eyes Have It: Sex and Sexual Orientation Differences in Pupil Dilation Patterns, PLoS ONE. 7(8). pdf

3. Experiment Complete 5%

5%
Description
  • Participants
  • Passation
  • Traitement des résultats
  • Discussion

4. Redaction du manuscript Complete 5%

5%
Description

This post is password protected. Enter the password to view comments.